State v. Russell

146 S.W.3d 454, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1501, 2004 WL 2340129
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 19, 2004·No. No. ED 83575·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Melvin Russell appeals the judgment on his conviction of one count of possession of a controlled substance in violation of section 195.202 RSMo (2000). Russell argues that the trial court plainly erred in admitting testimony regarding the statements of a confidential informant.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Russell, 146 S.W.3d 454, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1501, 2004 WL 2340129 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

146 S.W.3d 454 (State v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.