State v. Roscoe

93 Mo. 146
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1887·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Sherwood, J.

The merits of this cause cannot be considered, for the reason that the record shows that no order granting an appeal was ever made, and that the affidavit for an appeal was not made until in vacation, after the adjournment of the term of court at which final judgment was entered. State ex rel. v. Keuchler, 83 Mo. 193; State v. Rhodes, 86 Mo. 635; Brown v. Railroad, 83 Mo. 478; Cissell v. Cissell, 77 Mo. 371; Stavely v. Kunkel, 27 Mo. 422; Lengel v. Smith, 48 Mo. 276; Clelland v. Shaw, 51 Mo. 440; State ex rel. v. Lewis, 71 Mo. 170; Randolph v. Mauck, 78 Mo. 468; R. S., 1879, sec. 1973.

For these reasons, we have no jurisdiction of this cause, and, therefore, order the same stricken from the docket.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Roscoe, 93 Mo. 146 (Mo. 1887).

93 Mo. 146 (State v. Roscoe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Killoran v. Calhoun
211 S.W. 109 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1919)
Missouri v. Cook
105 S.W. 658 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1907)
State v. Smith
90 S.W. 440 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1905)