State v. Roscoe
This text of 93 Mo. 146 (State v. Roscoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The merits of this cause cannot be considered, for the reason that the record shows that no order granting an appeal was ever made, and that the affidavit for an appeal was not made until in vacation, after the adjournment of the term of court at which final judgment was entered. State ex rel. v. Keuchler, 83 Mo. 193; State v. Rhodes, 86 Mo. 635; Brown v. Railroad, 83 Mo. 478; Cissell v. Cissell, 77 Mo. 371; Stavely v. Kunkel, 27 Mo. 422; Lengel v. Smith, 48 Mo. 276; Clelland v. Shaw, 51 Mo. 440; State ex rel. v. Lewis, 71 Mo. 170; Randolph v. Mauck, 78 Mo. 468; R. S., 1879, sec. 1973.
For these reasons, we have no jurisdiction of this cause, and, therefore, order the same stricken from the docket.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 Mo. 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-roscoe-mo-1887.