State ex rel. Wooldridge v. Keuchler

83 Mo. 193
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 83 Mo. 193 (State ex rel. Wooldridge v. Keuchler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Wooldridge v. Keuchler, 83 Mo. 193 (Mo. 1884).

Opinion

Norton, J.

It is provided in section 3712, Rev. Stat., that no appeal shall be allowed, unless: First, it be made during the term at which the judgment or decision appealed from was rendered; and, second, the appellant or his agent shall, during the same term, file in the court his affidavit stating that such appeal is not made for vexation or delay, but because the affiant believes that the appellant is aggrieved by the judgment or decision of the court.

The record in this case shows that no affidavit for appeal -was filed during the term at which the judgment was 'rendered, but the affidavit was filed in vacation before the [195]*195clerk, and the appeal granted was conditioned on suck filing. In this state of tke record, tke following authorities justify tke dismissal of tke appeal as requested by respondent, and it is hereby dismissed. Lengle v. Smith, 48 Mo. 276; State ex rel. Partridge v. Lewis, 71 Mo. 170; Clelland & Co. v. Shaw, 51 Mo. 440; Stavely v. Kunkel, 27 Mo. 422.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United Iron Works Co. v. Sand Ridge Lead & Zinc Co.
102 S.W. 1104 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1907)
State v. Roscoe
93 Mo. 146 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1887)
Giesing v. Schowengerdt
24 Mo. App. 554 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1887)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 Mo. 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-wooldridge-v-keuchler-mo-1884.