J. W. Clelland & Co. v. Shaw

51 Mo. 440
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided January 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Adams, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant raises the objection that the appeal in this ease was improperly allowed by the Circuit Court. There was no affidavit made for the appeal as required by law. (See W. S., 1059, § 11.) This section provides that no appeal shall be allowed unless the appellant or his agent shall, during the term, file in the court his affidavit “ stating that such appeal is not made for vexation or delay, but because the affiant believes that the appellant is aggrieved by the judgment or decision of the court.” As no such affidavit appears in the record, the appeal is ordered to be dismissed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. W. Clelland & Co. v. Shaw, 51 Mo. 440 (Mo. 1873).

51 Mo. 440 (J. W. Clelland & Co. v. Shaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moller-Vandenboom Lumber Co. v. Boudreau
85 S.W.2d 141 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1935)
State v. Smith
90 S.W. 440 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1905)
Schnabel v. Thomas
92 Mo. App. 180 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1902)
State v. Roscoe
93 Mo. 146 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1887)
State ex rel. Wooldridge v. Keuchler
83 Mo. 193 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)