State v. Rodman

70 S.E. 161, 87 S.C. 542, 1911 S.C. LEXIS 17
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedFebruary 23, 1911
Docket7782
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 70 S.E. 161 (State v. Rodman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Rodman, 70 S.E. 161, 87 S.C. 542, 1911 S.C. LEXIS 17 (S.C. 1911).

Opinion

'The opinion of ¡the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Jones.

The defendant was convicted and sentenced for the misdemeanor of obstructing a public road and on appeal to this Court the judgment was affirmed June 13, 1910, and remittitur was sent down, 86 S. C. 154. Thereafter, at July term, 1910, of General Sessions for Chester county, a motion for new trial on after discovered evidence was made before Judge Shipp, who dismissed the matter on the ground that he had no jurisdiction to hear the motion after the remittitur had been sent down.

The Circuit Court has jurisdiction to entertain such motion, not only while an appeal is pending in this Court, but after the remittitur has gone down. State v. Lee, 80 S. C. 367, 61 S. E. 657; Mills v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. Co., 82 S. C. 126, 63 S. E. 308.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hawkins
114 S.E. 538 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 S.E. 161, 87 S.C. 542, 1911 S.C. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rodman-sc-1911.