Mills v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.
63 S.E. 308, 82 S.C. 126, 1909 S.C. LEXIS 6
Opinion
Order by
Under the case of the State v. Lee, 80 S. C., 367, recently decided by this Court en banc, the Circuit Court has jurisdiction to entertain a motion for a new trial on the ground of after-discovered evidence, notwithstanding the pendency of an appeal in this Court, and the proper practice is to make such motion in that Court.
*127 This Court is, however, not precluded from hearing the appeal now pending, and will do so unless there is other ground for continuance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mills v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R., 63 S.E. 308, 82 S.C. 126, 1909 S.C. LEXIS 6 (S.C. 1909).
63 S.E. 308 (Mills v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hawkins
114 S.E. 538 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1922)
State v. Rodman
70 S.E. 161 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1911)