State v. Lee

61 S.E. 657, 80 S.C. 367, 1908 S.C. LEXIS 176
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided June 4, 1908·No. 6922·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a motion to suspend an appeal from an order of Judge Gage at chambers, refusing defendant’s motion for a new trial on the ground of after-discovered evidence for the purpose of allowing a motion before the Circuit Court for a new trial on after-discovered evidence. This Court is of the opinion that it is without jurisdiction to entertain this motion, and it is therefore refused.

*368 In reaching this conclusion the Court overrules the doctrine announced in the case of State v. Turner, 39 S. C., 436, 17 S. E., 885, and cases following the same, and is now of the opinion that the Circuit Court alone has jurisdiction to entertain such a motion. No doubt the execution of the sentence imposed upon the defendant'will be respited by the proper authority until an opportunity is allowed him to make this motion in the proper court.

CIRCUIT Judges Gary and Watts concur in this order only to the extent of refusing the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lee, 61 S.E. 657, 80 S.C. 367, 1908 S.C. LEXIS 176 (S.C. 1908).

61 S.E. 657 (State v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Citizens Bank v. Heyward
142 S.E. 651 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1926)
State v. Hawkins
114 S.E. 538 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1922)
State v. Williams
93 S.E. 1006 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1917)
State v. Rodman
70 S.E. 161 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1911)
Mills v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.
69 S.E. 97 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1910)