State v. Ratcliff

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Ratcliff

584 So. 2d 665, 1991 La. LEXIS 2273, 1991 WL 173523

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Ratcliff. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 La. LEXIS 1385 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 6, 1991·No. No. 91-KH-1994·Published

Opinion

In re Ratcliff, Theodore; — Defendant^); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 274-566.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post-conviction relief he has filed on or about May 30, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the appli[666]*666cation. If relator s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon' the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ratcliff, Theodore; — Defendant^); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 274-566.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application for post-conviction relief he has filed on or about May 30, 1991. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the appli[666]*666cation. If relator s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon' the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.

State v. Ratcliff, 584 So. 2d 665, 1991 La. LEXIS 2273, 1991 WL 173523 (La. 1991).

Pincite

584 So. 2d 665 (State v. Ratcliff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.