State v. Ratcliff

558 So. 2d 1133, 1990 La. LEXIS 406, 1990 WL 10056
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Ratcliff. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 La. LEXIS 1385
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 5, 1990·No. No. 90-KH-0240·Published

Opinion

In re Ratcliff, Theodore; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 274-566.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion (for Boykin transcript and waiver of rights form) he claims to have filed on or about October 31, 1989. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ratcliff, 558 So. 2d 1133, 1990 La. LEXIS 406, 1990 WL 10056 (La. 1990).

558 So. 2d 1133 (State v. Ratcliff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.