State v. Ratcliff
This text of 558 So. 2d 1133 (State v. Ratcliff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Ratcliff, Theodore; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of mandamus, supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”, No. 274-566.
The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion (for Boykin transcript and waiver of rights form) he claims to have filed on or about October 31, 1989. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
558 So. 2d 1133, 1990 La. LEXIS 406, 1990 WL 10056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ratcliff-la-1990.