State v. Pierce

880 N.E.2d 485, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1510
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 6, 2008
Docket2007-1605
StatusPublished

This text of 880 N.E.2d 485 (State v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Pierce, 880 N.E.2d 485, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1510 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 88470, 2007-Ohio-3665. Reported at 116 Ohio St.3d 1437, 2007-Ohio-6518, 877 N.E.2d 989. On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted. Discretionary appeal is also accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II, and cause continues to be held for the decision in 2006-2187, Hyle v. [1511]*1511Porter, Hamilton App. No. C-050768, 170 Ohio App.3d 710, 2006-Ohio-5454.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Pierce, 88470 (7-19-2007)
2007 Ohio 3665 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Hyle v. Porter
868 N.E.2d 1047 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
880 N.E.2d 485, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-pierce-ohio-2008.