Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Pierce

State v. Pierce

898 N.E.2d 960, 120 Ohio St. 3d 321
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Pierce. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 Ohio St. 3d 1225 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 9, 2008·No. No. 2007-1605·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Ferguson, 120 Ohio St.3d 7, 2008-Ohio-4824, 896 N.E.2d 110.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Lanzinger, J., in State v. Ferguson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Pierce, 898 N.E.2d 960, 120 Ohio St. 3d 321 (Ohio 2008).

898 N.E.2d 960 (State v. Pierce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Ferguson
896 N.E.2d 110 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)