State v. Ostergard

360 So. 2d 414
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 8, 1978·No. Nos. 51521, 51534·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The writs of certiorari were granted to review the decisions of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, in State v. Gutierrez, 344 So.2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), and State v. Ostergard, 343 So.2d 874 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), because of apparent conflict with State v. Barnett, 339 So.2d 1159 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976). We have recently disapproved the decision of the District Court of Appeal in Barnett and concurred with the decision and rationale of the District Court in Ostergard. McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978). Having dispelled the conflict, we discharge the writs heretofore issued.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and BOYD, ENGLAND and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., concurs specially with an opinion, with which ENGLAND, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ostergard, 360 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 1978).

360 So. 2d 414 (State v. Ostergard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
211 So. 3d 176 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Scott v. State
102 So. 3d 676 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Klem v. ESPEJO-NORTON
983 So. 2d 1235 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Ross v. State
664 So. 2d 1004 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Martin v. State
488 So. 2d 653 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
State v. Black
385 So. 2d 1372 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)