Martin v. State
This text of 483 So. 2d 562 (Martin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is another appeal from a guideline departure sentence and, once again, we are [563]*563compelled to reverse as the reasons for departure given by the lower court were invalid. See Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(b)(1); Hendrix v. State, 475 So.2d 1218 (Fla.1985); Monti v. State, 480 So.2d 223 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Thompson v. State, 478 So.2d 462 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Mischler v. State, 458 So.2d 37 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
REVERSED and REMANDED for re-sentencing pursuant to the guidelines, absent clear and convincing reasons for departure.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
483 So. 2d 562, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 529, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.