State v. Nilsawit
This text of State v. Nilsawit (State v. Nilsawit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-15-0000372 27-MAY-2016 08:00 AM
SCWC-15-0000372
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
SIRIPORN NILSAWIT, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee,
and
HAWAII NEWS NOW, Petitioner/Applicant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-15-0000372; CASE NO. 1DCW-14-0001187)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Applicant-Appellant Hawaii News Now’s
Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on April 15, 2016, is
hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be
heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant
1 to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move
for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 27, 2016.
Bruce D. Voss and /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald David R. Major /s/ Paula A. Nakayama for petitioner /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Nilsawit, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-nilsawit-haw-2016.