State v. Nilsawit

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Nilsawit. Read the opinion of the Court — 139 Haw. 86
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided May 27, 2016·No. SCWC-15-0000372·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-15-0000372

27-MAY-2016

08:00 AM

SCWC-15-0000372

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee, vs.

SIRIPORN NILSAWIT, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee, and

HAWAII NEWS NOW, Petitioner/Applicant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-15-0000372; CASE NO. 1DCW-14-0001187)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Applicant-Appellant Hawaii News Now’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on April 15, 2016, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant

to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 27, 2016.

Bruce D. Voss and /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald David R. Major /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

for petitioner /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Nilsawit, (haw 2016).

State v. Nilsawit (State v. Nilsawit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.