State v. Miller

337 Or. App. 598
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJanuary 29, 2025
DocketA180935
StatusUnpublished

This text of 337 Or. App. 598 (State v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Miller, 337 Or. App. 598 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

598 January 29, 2025 No. 70

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DONALD LEE MILLER, Defendant-Appellant. Linn County Circuit Court 17CR01061; A180935

Thomas McHill, Judge. Submitted December 20, 2024. G. Aron Perez-Selsky and Michael J. Wallace filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Christopher A. Perdue, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, Egan, Judge, and Hellman, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. State v. Stevens, 329 Or App 118, 540 P3d 50 (2023), rev den, 372 Or 437 (2024).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Stevens
540 P.3d 50 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
337 Or. App. 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-miller-orctapp-2025.