State v. Miller

818 P.2d 1302, 109 Or. App. 489, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1613
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 Or. App. 349
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 30, 1991·No. 88-02-32411, 88-02-32412, 88-03-32639; CA A66775, A66776, A66777·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from his convictions for three counts of criminal conspiracy to commit first degree theft, ORS 161.450; ORS 164.055, for which he received sentences of five years’ imprisonment with a six-month minimum on each count, to be served consecutively. He was also convicted of three counts of attempted first degree theft, ORS 161.405; ORS 164.055, and was sentenced to six months’ imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently with the conspiracy sentences. We affirm the conspiracy convictions but vacate the attempt convictions.

Defendant’s challenges to his conspiracy convictions require no discussion. We accept the state’s concession that defendant was improperly convicted of both attempt and conspiracy for the same conduct. ORS 161.485(2).1

Judgment of conviction for conspiracy to commit first degree theft affirmed; judgment of conviction for attempted first degree theft vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Miller, 818 P.2d 1302, 109 Or. App. 489, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1613 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

818 P.2d 1302 (State v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 161.450
Oregon § 161.450
§ 164.055
Oregon § 164.055
§ 161.405
Oregon § 161.405
§ 161.485
Oregon § 161.485