State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Miller

769 P.2d 788, 95 Or. App. 439, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 231

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMarch 1, 1989

Docket880117M; CA A48812

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 769 P.2d 788 (State v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Miller, 769 P.2d 788, 95 Or. App. 439, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 231 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) case, defendant argues that he should have been allowed to assert the defense of involuntary intoxication. He asks us to reconsider our opinion in State v. Maguire, 78 Or App 459, 717 P2d 226 (1986), affirmed without opinion by an equally divided court, 303 Or 368, 736 P2d 193 (1987), in which we held that DUII is a strict liability offense. We decline to do so. See State v. Bunch, 87 Or App 386, 387, 742 P2d 74 (1987).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) case, defendant argues that he should have been allowed to assert the defense of involuntary intoxication. He asks us to reconsider our opinion in State v. Maguire, 78 Or App 459, 717 P2d 226 (1986), affirmed without opinion by an equally divided court, 303 Or 368, 736 P2d 193 (1987), in which we held that DUII is a strict liability offense. We decline to do so. See State v. Bunch, 87 Or App 386, 387, 742 P2d 74 (1987).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

769 P.2d 788, 95 Or. App. 439, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-miller-orctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack