State v. Miller
854 P.2d 1007, 121 Or. App. 428, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1013
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 Or. App. 349 →
Opinion
Defendant’s motion to strike the state’s brief is denied. On the merits, defendant raises a constitutional vagueness challenge directed at the traffic infraction of “failure to wear approved headgear.” ORS814.269; ORS815.050. Assuming, without deciding, that such a challenge is appropriate in a case not involving penal sanctions, we conclude that the laws cited by defendant are not unconstitutionally vague. Defendant’s concerns are best addressed to the legislature.
Motion to strike state’s brief denied; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Miller, 854 P.2d 1007, 121 Or. App. 428, 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 1013 (Or. Ct. App. 1993).
854 P.2d 1007 (State v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.