Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Miller

State v. Miller

100 So. 3d 1213, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19566, 2012 WL 5458096
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 9, 2012
DocketNo. 2D11-5360
StatusPublished

This text of 100 So. 3d 1213 (State v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Miller, 100 So. 3d 1213, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19566, 2012 WL 5458096 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Shannon Miller was charged with two counts of possession of a controlled substance and one count of possession of paraphernalia. The circuit court granted Miller’s motion to dismiss the two possession of a controlled substance charges on the basis that section 893.13, Florida Statutes (2010), was unconstitutional. The State has appealed the dismissal. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012).

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Adkins
96 So. 3d 412 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 So. 3d 1213, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19566, 2012 WL 5458096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-miller-fladistctapp-2012.