State v. Miller

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Miller

100 So. 3d 1213, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19566, 2012 WL 5458096

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3991 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 9, 2012·No. No. 2D11-5360·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Shannon Miller was charged with two counts of possession of a controlled substance and one count of possession of paraphernalia. The circuit court granted Miller’s motion to dismiss the two possession of a controlled substance charges on the basis that section 893.13, Florida Statutes (2010), was unconstitutional. The State has appealed the dismissal. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012).

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Shannon Miller was charged with two counts of possession of a controlled substance and one count of possession of paraphernalia. The circuit court granted Miller’s motion to dismiss the two possession of a controlled substance charges on the basis that section 893.13, Florida Statutes (2010), was unconstitutional. The State has appealed the dismissal. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012).

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

State v. Miller, 100 So. 3d 1213, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 19566, 2012 WL 5458096 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

100 So. 3d 1213 (State v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related