State v. Miller

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Miller

133 So. 3d 1176, 2014 WL 866161, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3053

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 5, 2014

DocketNo. 2D13-1378

StatusPublished

This text of 133 So. 3d 1176 (State v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Miller, 133 So. 3d 1176, 2014 WL 866161, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3053 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals an order suppressing physical evidence and statements. This court has jurisdiction under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c)(1)(B). We reverse the trial court’s order under the authority of our decision in State v. Mitchell, 124 So.3d 1046 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

In the underlying trial court case, Mr. Miller is a codefendant of the appellee in Mitchell. The facts and legal rulings that gave rise to the order under review in this case are substantially identical to those in Mitchell. Accordingly, as we did in Mitchell, we reverse the trial court’s order granting the motion to suppress and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT, WALLACE, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI