State v. Miller

133 So. 3d 1176, 2014 WL 866161, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3053
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8290
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 5, 2014·No. No. 2D13-1378·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals an order suppressing physical evidence and statements. This court has jurisdiction under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c)(1)(B). We reverse the trial court’s order under the authority of our decision in State v. Mitchell, 124 So.3d 1046 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

In the underlying trial court case, Mr. Miller is a codefendant of the appellee in Mitchell. The facts and legal rulings that gave rise to the order under review in this case are substantially identical to those in Mitchell. Accordingly, as we did in Mitchell, we reverse the trial court’s order granting the motion to suppress and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

NORTHCUTT, WALLACE, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Miller, 133 So. 3d 1176, 2014 WL 866161, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 3053 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

133 So. 3d 1176 (State v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mitchell
124 So. 3d 1046 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)