Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. . McKnight

State v. . McKnight

145 S.E. 281, 196 N.C. 259, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 340
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 14, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 145 S.E. 281 (State v. . McKnight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . McKnight, 145 S.E. 281, 196 N.C. 259, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 340 (N.C. 1928).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

Judgment in a criminal prosecution may be arrested, on motion duly made, when, and only when, some fatal error or defect appears on the.face of the record. S. v. Lewis, 194 N. C., 620, 140 S. E., 434; S. v. Mitchem, 188 N. C., 608, 125 S. E., 190; S. v. Efird, 186 N. C., 482, 119 S. E., 881; S. v. Jenkins, 164 N. C., 527, 80 S. E., 231; S. v. Douglass, 63 N. C., 500; S. v. Roberts, 19 N. C., 541. But this would not include a variance between the indictment and the proof, or want of evidence to support the verdict, for they are not matters appearing on the face of the record proper. S. v. Jarvis, 129 N. C., 698, 40 S. E., 220; S. v. McLain, 104 N. C., 894, 10 S. E., 518; McCanless v. Flinchum, 98 N. C., 358, 4 S. E., 359.

The indictment, in the instant case, includes, or is sufficient in form to charge, the offense of larceny. C. S., 4640. Hence, the motion in arrest of judgment was properly overruled.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Sellers
147 S.E.2d 225 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
State v. Kimball
135 S.E.2d 568 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)
Wolfe v. North Carolina
364 U.S. 177 (Supreme Court, 1960)
State v. Eason
86 S.E.2d 774 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1955)
State v. Williams
75 S.E.2d 301 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
State v. Gaston
73 S.E.2d 311 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
State v. Vanhoy
52 S.E.2d 278 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
State v. . Foster
44 S.E.2d 447 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1947)
State v. . Morgan
38 S.E.2d 166 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
State v. . Dilliard
27 S.E.2d 85 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1943)
State v. . McKeon
26 S.E.2d 914 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1943)
State v. . Brown
11 S.E.2d 321 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
State v. . McCollum
6 S.E.2d 503 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
State v. . Black
5 S.E.2d 313 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)
State v. . Linney
194 S.E. 470 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)
State v. . Robertson
186 S.E. 247 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
State v. . Bradley
186 S.E. 240 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
State v. . Satterfield
176 S.E. 466 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
State v. . Bittings
175 S.E. 299 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)
State v. . Ross
154 S.E. 736 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 S.E. 281, 196 N.C. 259, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcknight-nc-1928.