Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. . Brown

State v. . Brown

11 S.E.2d 294, 218 N.C. 368, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 157
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 30, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 11 S.E.2d 294 (State v. . Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Brown, 11 S.E.2d 294, 218 N.C. 368, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 157 (N.C. 1940).

Opinion

BaRNHill, J.

The appellant contends that it was error for the court to enter judgment absolute on the sci. fa. until such sci. fa. had been served on the principal and that, therefore, the judgment pronounced is voidable and unenforceable. The question thus sought to be presented is decided by this Court in Bond Co. v. Krider, ante, 361. The decision in that case is controlling. As the defendant Brown was permitted t0‘ remain at large under the bond until the second Monday of the court, his failure to appear constitutes a forfeiture thereof. S. v. Staley, 200 N. C., 385, 157 S. E., 25.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Simms
83 S.E.2d 481 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
State v. Jenkins
83 S.E.2d 480 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
State v. Dew
83 S.E.2d 482 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
Tomlinson v. Sharpe
37 S.E.2d 498 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
Southern Auto Company v. Fletcher
28 S.E.2d 184 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 S.E.2d 294, 218 N.C. 368, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-nc-1940.