State v. Simms

83 S.E.2d 481, 240 N.C. 600, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 471
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 22, 1954
StatusPublished

This text of 83 S.E.2d 481 (State v. Simms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Simms, 83 S.E.2d 481, 240 N.C. 600, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 471 (N.C. 1954).

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The facts in this case are substantially on all fours with the facts in S. v. Dew, ante, 595, except that the appellant alleges in its proposed amendment to its answer that this defendant has been apprehended and was returned to the Wilson County jail on 16 April 1954. What is said in the opinion in that ease is controlling here.

While the subsequent arrest of the defendant does not, ipso facto, discharge the original forfeiture, Tar Heel Bond Co. v. Krider, 218 N.C. 361, 11 S.E. 2d 291; S. v. Brown, 218 N.C. 368, 11 S.E. 2d 294, the door is still open to the defendant to appeal to the court to modify the judgment absolute for the reason the defendant has been apprehended and surrendered to the Wilson County authorities.

The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. . Brown
11 S.E.2d 294 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)
Tar Heel Bond Co. v. Krider
11 S.E.2d 291 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 S.E.2d 481, 240 N.C. 600, 1954 N.C. LEXIS 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-simms-nc-1954.