State v. . Lewis
This text of 140 S.E. 434 (State v. . Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment must be arrested on authority of what was said in S. v. Johnson, 188 N. C., 591, 125 S. E., 183, for that no crime is charged in the warrant upon which the defendant has been tried and convicted.
It is provided by C. S., 5758, with certain exemptions not now material, that every parent, guardian, or other person in the State having charge or control of a child between the ages of eight and fourteen years “shall cause such child to attend school continuously for a period equal to the time which the public school in the district in which the child resides shall be in session.”
It will be observed that the statute does not make the failure to cause the attendance of a child, between the ages mentioned, in the public school a crime, but the offense is defined as the failure on the part of the parent, guardian, or other person having control of such child, to cause said child to attend school continuously for a period equal to the time the public school of the district shall be in session. Indeed, it would be an infringement upon the rights of private schools to require that all children of school age shall attend one of the public schools of the district in which they reside. Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U. S., 510.
The defect or omission appearing, as it does, on the face of the record, may be taken advantage of by motion in arrest of judgment. S. v. Jenkins, 164 N. C., 527, 80 S. E., 231; S. v. Baker, 106 N. C., 758, 11 S. E., 360.
Error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
140 S.E. 434, 194 N.C. 620, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lewis-nc-1927.