State v. . Johnson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Johnson

124 S.E. 926, 188 N.C. 824, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 205

DecidedOctober 29, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 124 S.E. 926 (State v. . Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Johnson, 124 S.E. 926, 188 N.C. 824, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 205 (N.C. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Oubiam.

Tbe case on trial narrowed itself to a controverted question of fact. We are convinced, from a careful perusal of tbe record, that tbe cause has been tried in substantial compliance with tbe law bearing on tbe subject, and no ruling or action on tbe part of tbe trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible or prejudicial error. Tbe exceptions deal almost exclusively with questions of evidence and motions for dismissal. Tbe validity of tbe trial must be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Oubiam.

Tbe case on trial narrowed itself to a controverted question of fact. We are convinced, from a careful perusal of tbe record, that tbe cause has been tried in substantial compliance with tbe law bearing on tbe subject, and no ruling or action on tbe part of tbe trial court has been discovered by us which we apprehend should be held for reversible or prejudicial error. Tbe exceptions deal almost exclusively with questions of evidence and motions for dismissal. Tbe validity of tbe trial must be upheld.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 S.E. 926, 188 N.C. 824, 1924 N.C. LEXIS 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-johnson-nc-1924.