State v. McDonald
This text of 103 P. 512 (State v. McDonald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
1.
This is a motion to affirm a judgment, on the ground of the failure of the appellant to file a brief within the time limited by the rules of this court.
This cause was submitted at Pendleton; May 6, 1909, and transmitted to Salem for argument. The submission necessitates a casual examination, at least, of the errors assigned.
The briefs on the part of both parties háve been filed, and, as the order of submission takes the case out of the operation of our rules, the motion should be denied, and it is so ordered. Motion Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 P. 512, 55 Or. 419, 1909 Ore. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-mcdonald-or-1909.