Adams v. Lewis
1 F. Cas. 132, 5 Sawy. 229, 10 Chi. Leg. News 403, 1878 U.S. App. LEXIS 1592
Opinion
The ruling of the district judge, both upon the admission of the evidence and in the instruction given to the jury, was correct, and for the reasons given by him. The motion for a new trial is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Adams v. Lewis, 1 F. Cas. 132, 5 Sawy. 229, 10 Chi. Leg. News 403, 1878 U.S. App. LEXIS 1592 (uscirct 1878).
1 F. Cas. 132 (Adams v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Industrial Hospital Ass'n v. Ege
165 P.2d 576 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1945)
Henkle v. Patterson
56 P.2d 343 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1936)
Fox v. Fox
221 N.W. 889 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1928)
State v. McDonald
103 P. 512 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1909)
Morgan's Estate
77 P. 608 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1904)