State v. Malone

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Malone

941 S.W.2d 765, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 436

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 18, 1997

DocketNos. 69601, 70987

StatusPublished

This text of 941 S.W.2d 765 (State v. Malone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Malone, 941 S.W.2d 765, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 436 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Barbara Malone appeals her conviction, after a jury trial, of stealing, third offense, in violation of §§ 570.080 and 570.040 RSMo 1994 on which she was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. Malone also appeals from a judgment denying on the merits, without an evidentiary hearing, her Rule 29.15 motion. No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Barbara Malone appeals her conviction, after a jury trial, of stealing, third offense, in violation of §§ 570.080 and 570.040 RSMo 1994 on which she was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. Malone also appeals from a judgment denying on the merits, without an evidentiary hearing, her Rule 29.15 motion. No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

941 S.W.2d 765, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-malone-moctapp-1997.