State v. Lopez

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Lopez

230 S.W.3d 7, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 907, 2007 WL 1746992

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 19, 2007

DocketED 88321

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 230 S.W.3d 7 (State v. Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lopez, 230 S.W.3d 7, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 907, 2007 WL 1746992 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER ■

PER CURIAM.

German Lopez (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, in accordance with a jury verdict, convicting him of two counts of statutory rape in the first degree in violation of Section 566.032 RSMo 2000. Defendant was sentenced to two concurrent terms of imprisonment for. twenty years.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that sufficient evidence exists from which a reasonable juror could have found Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Grim, 854 S.W.2d 403, 411 (Mo. banc 1993). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER ■

PER CURIAM.

German Lopez (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, in accordance with a jury verdict, convicting him of two counts of statutory rape in the first degree in violation of Section 566.032 RSMo 2000. Defendant was sentenced to two concurrent terms of imprisonment for. twenty years.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that sufficient evidence exists from which a reasonable juror could have found Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Grim, 854 S.W.2d 403, 411 (Mo. banc 1993). No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 S.W.3d 7, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 907, 2007 WL 1746992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lopez-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack