Scranton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Scranton v. State

230 S.W.3d 7, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 900, 2007 WL 1746825

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 19, 2007

DocketED 89011, ED 89012

StatusPublished

This text of 230 S.W.3d 7 (Scranton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scranton v. State, 230 S.W.3d 7, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 900, 2007 WL 1746825 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Tadarra Scranton, appeals pro se from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing on two of his claims. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Tadarra Scranton, appeals pro se from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing on two of his claims. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 S.W.3d 7, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 900, 2007 WL 1746825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scranton-v-state-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack