State v. Lopez

255 S.W.3d 565, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 832, 2008 WL 2491748
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 24, 2008
DocketWD 67901
StatusPublished

This text of 255 S.W.3d 565 (State v. Lopez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Lopez, 255 S.W.3d 565, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 832, 2008 WL 2491748 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Lopez appeals his conviction for possession of controlled substance under section 195.202. He challenges the effectiveness of his trial counsel’s representation and the trial court’s ruling on a motion for continuance.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Sales
255 S.W.3d 565 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 S.W.3d 565, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 832, 2008 WL 2491748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lopez-moctapp-2008.