State v. Lopez
255 S.W.3d 565, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 832, 2008 WL 2491748
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Lopez appeals his conviction for possession of controlled substance under section 195.202. He challenges the effectiveness of his trial counsel’s representation and the trial court’s ruling on a motion for continuance.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Lopez, 255 S.W.3d 565, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 832, 2008 WL 2491748 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
255 S.W.3d 565 (State v. Lopez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Sales
255 S.W.3d 565 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)