State v. Lemon

447 P.2d 394, 251 Or. 606, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 499
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided November 27, 1968·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant Ralph H. Lemon was indicted by the grand jury and convicted of the crimes of opening a parking meter with intent to steal and illegal possession of a key to a parking meter. The defendant through his trial attorney filed notice of appeal.

*607 The defendant made application for the appointment of counsel on appeal and for transcript of the trial proceedings, but refused to set forth “in writing * * * a brief statement of his assets, liabilities and income in the previous year” as required by OES 138.500. Upon defendant’s refusal to comply with the statute, his request was denied and there is before this court no transcript of the evidence. The defendant has filed a brief in propria persona.

In the absence of a transcript of the evidence this case presents no issue other than the sufficiency of the indictment to support the conviction. Coon v. Humble, 238 Or 172, 393 P2d 655; Steenson v. Robinson, 236 Or 414, 385 P2d 738, 389 P2d 27.

The indictment is sufficient to charge the crimes of which the defendant was convicted and the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lemon, 447 P.2d 394, 251 Or. 606, 1968 Ore. LEXIS 499 (Or. 1968).

447 P.2d 394 (State v. Lemon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Prew
161 P.3d 323 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2007)
State v. Marker
536 P.2d 1273 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1975)
State v. Longoria
520 P.2d 912 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1974)
City of Coquille v. Schafer
511 P.2d 877 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1973)
Lemon v. State
499 P.2d 819 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1972)