City of Coquille v. Schafer

511 P.2d 877, 14 Or. App. 88, 1973 Ore. App. LEXIS 863
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 16, 1973
DocketNo. 7823
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 511 P.2d 877 (City of Coquille v. Schafer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Coquille v. Schafer, 511 P.2d 877, 14 Or. App. 88, 1973 Ore. App. LEXIS 863 (Or. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

The defendant was convicted in the municipal [89]*89court of the city of Coquille of attempting to elude a police officer. Upon appeal he was also convicted of the same charge in the Coos County Circuit Court, after a trial by the court in each instance.

The defendant gave notice of appeal to this court from the circuit court judgment but made no designation of record so that there is no transcript of evidence and the only record before us is the trial court file. OES 19.074. Defendant filed a “brief” in propria persona.

In the absence of a transcript of the evidence, the case presents no issue other than the .sufficiency of the uniform traffic citation to support the conviction. State v. Lemon, 251 Or 606, 447 P2d 394, cert denied 393 US 1004 (1968). The uniform traffic citation complies with OES 484.170

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Marker
536 P.2d 1273 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
511 P.2d 877, 14 Or. App. 88, 1973 Ore. App. LEXIS 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-coquille-v-schafer-orctapp-1973.