State v. Lane

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Lane

131 S.W.3d 855, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 538, 2004 WL 770156

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 13, 2004

DocketED 82522

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 131 S.W.3d 855 (State v. Lane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Lane, 131 S.W.3d 855, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 538, 2004 WL 770156 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Keith A. Lane (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court convicting him of two counts of first-degree statutory rape, in violation of Section 566.062 RSMo 2000 1 ; four counts of statutory sodomy, in violation of Section 566.062; two counts of incest, in violation of Section 568.020; and two counts of abuse of a child, in violation of Section 568.060. The trial court found Defendant to be a prior and persistent offender under Section 558.016 and a predatory sexual offender under Section 558.018. The trial court sentenced Defendant to six terms of life imprisonment on the rape and sodomy counts, two ten-year terms of imprisonment on the incest *856 counts, and two twenty-year terms of imprisonment on the child abuse counts. The trial court ordered that the rape counts be served consecutively to each other and to all other counts, and that the remaining counts be served consecutively to the rape counts, but concurrently with each other.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent statutory cites are to RSMo 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Keith A. Lane (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court convicting him of two counts of first-degree statutory rape, in violation of Section 566.062 RSMo 2000 1 ; four counts of statutory sodomy, in violation of Section 566.062; two counts of incest, in violation of Section 568.020; and two counts of abuse of a child, in violation of Section 568.060. The trial court found Defendant to be a prior and persistent offender under Section 558.016 and a predatory sexual offender under Section 558.018. The trial court sentenced Defendant to six terms of life imprisonment on the rape and sodomy counts, two ten-year terms of imprisonment on the incest *856 counts, and two twenty-year terms of imprisonment on the child abuse counts. The trial court ordered that the rape counts be served consecutively to each other and to all other counts, and that the remaining counts be served consecutively to the rape counts, but concurrently with each other.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no jurisprudential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. Unless otherwise indicated, all subsequent statutory cites are to RSMo 2000.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 S.W.3d 855, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 538, 2004 WL 770156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-lane-moctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack