State v. Lane

190 S.W.3d 445, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 356, 2006 WL 770148
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Lane. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 538
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 28, 2006·No. WD 64822·Published

Opinion

*446 Order

PER CURIAM.

Charles Lane, Jr. (“Lane”) appeals from a conviction following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County for murder in the first degree in violation of section 565.020 and armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015. Lane argues two points on appeal. In Point I, Lane argues the trial court erred in overruling his motion for mistrial when, during the State’s closing argument, the prosecutor responded to a comment made by Lane by twice stating “now he speaks” because the prosecutor’s comments violated Lane’s right to remain silent by bringing Lane’s failure to testify to the jury’s attention. In Point II, Lane argues the trial court erred in overruling his motions for acquittal at the close of the State’s evidence and at the close of all evidence, in entering judgments of conviction, and in sentencing him for murder in the first degree and armed criminal action, because the State’s evidence did not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that Lane caused his wife’s death after deliberation upon the matter.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. A written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, prepared a memorandum for the use of the parties only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Lane, 190 S.W.3d 445, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 356, 2006 WL 770148 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

190 S.W.3d 445 (State v. Lane) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.