Lane v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lane v. State

180 S.W.3d 518, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 6, 2006 WL 8435

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 3, 2006

DocketWD 64567

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 180 S.W.3d 518 (Lane v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lane v. State, 180 S.W.3d 518, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 6, 2006 WL 8435 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

*519 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeff Lane appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*519 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeff Lane appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 S.W.3d 518, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 6, 2006 WL 8435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lane-v-state-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack