Lane v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lane v. State

253 S.W.3d 584, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 696, 2008 WL 2098064

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lane v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 317 S.W.3d 125 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 2008·No. No. ED 90255·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Timothy Lane, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Timothy Lane, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Lane v. State, 253 S.W.3d 584, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 696, 2008 WL 2098064 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

253 S.W.3d 584 (Lane v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.