State v. Knight, 04-Ca-35 (9-26-2008)

2008 Ohio 4926
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 26, 2008
DocketNo. 04-CA-35.
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 2008 Ohio 4926 (State v. Knight, 04-Ca-35 (9-26-2008)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Knight, 04-Ca-35 (9-26-2008), 2008 Ohio 4926 (Ohio Ct. App. 2008).

Opinions

OPINION
{¶ 1} Tyrone Knight appeals from his convictions in the Clark County Common Pleas Court of aggravated arson and murder. In his first appeal, Knight's appointed *Page 2 counsel could find no arguable merit to Knight's appeal. We, however, discovered an arguable issue and that was whether Knight's confession to police was voluntarily made. We permitted Knight's appointed counsel to withdraw and we appointed new counsel to address this issue and any other counsel wished to pursue on Knight's behalf.

{¶ 2} On February 15, 2002, Knight was involved in a heated argument with Anthony Harris at the Striver's Club in Springfield. A fight ensued between Harris and Knight and John Carson joined the fray to assist Harris. Knight left the scene in his girlfriend's car and later drove past Carson's home. Harris and Carson threw objects at the car as it passed. Early the next morning, Knight threw a firebomb at Carson's home. The home caught fire and fourteen-year-old Olajuwon "Bear" Carson died in the fire.

{¶ 3} Three days later, Springfield Police were contacted by Knight's mother because police had informed her that the Carsons were "casing" her house and that she and her son were in danger. She assured police that her son had denied responsibility for the fire. Officer James Hall arranged to pick up Knight and his mother to bring them to the police station for questioning. Knight subsequently confessed to throwing a Molotov Cocktail into the Carson home after being questioned by the police but denied intending to kill anyone.

{¶ 4} Knight was then charged and later indicted for two counts of aggravated arson and aggravated murder and twelve counts of attempted murder. Prior to trial, Knight moved to suppress the confession he gave to the police, which was overruled by the trial court. A jury subsequently convicted Knight of aggravated arson and murder. He was sentenced to a mandatory term of fifteen years to life and a five-year term on the aggravated arson conviction. The court ordered the terms be served consecutively *Page 3 after considering the factors listed in R.C. 2929.14.

{¶ 5} In his first assignment, Appellant contends the trial court erred in finding that his statements to the police were voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently made. Knight contends the police coerced his confession by promising him leniency and in ignoring his request for counsel.

{¶ 6} We have reviewed the videotape of Knight's interrogation by the police and the transcript of that videotape. Knight told Detective Darwin Hicks at the outset that he was willing to talk to the police about the allegations he firebombed the Carson home. (Tr. 1, Defense Ex. A.) Knight then explained at length the altercation which occurred at Striver's Club. (Tr. 2-4, Defense Ex. A.) Knight told Detective Douglas Estep that everybody on the street were saying he was responsible for the fire, but he "wouldn't do that." (Tr. 13, Defense Ex. A.)

{¶ 7} The following exchange then occurred between Detective Barry Eggers and the defendant:

{¶ 8} "Eggers: You've got problems, okay. And I heard that you were gonna come down here to talk to us. I thought it was because you were gonna set the record straight. And I've been listening to what's going on in here and basically you're strapping yourself in the chair.

{¶ 9} "A: Well, can I talk to my lawyer then if there is something wrong like that? Do I need one or something?

{¶ 10} "Eggers: Everything you're telling us is basically sort of true except for you talking about you didn't have no beef with anybody and everybody at that bar says that you were, you were in a fighting mood. And you're in here trying to make us believe *Page 4 that you were just happy-go-lucky.

{¶ 11} "A: I mean I'm not saying I was happy-go-lucky, but I don't remember me knocking anybody's drink off the table. If I did I'd have bought them another. If I did, I probably bumped it off the table by walking by or something like that. But I wasn't knocking nobody's beer —

{¶ 12} "Eggers: Here's the thing, you need to think about this. We know you never intended to kill nobody, but you come in here with this story that I wasn't there and not showing any remorse for what happened.

{¶ 13} "A: I'm not saying, I'm not saying that I'm not-that I don't feel bad about what happened to the — I know what happened.

{¶ 14} "Eggers: Well, you know, like I'm saying, we know you didn't mean to kill nobody. You have got to get his-you have got to set the record straight. Our evidence, we've been working this since it happened and our evidence clearly shows that you are the person responsible for this fire. But in my mind I don't think that you meant to kill anybody. But the only way you're gonna convince us of that is if you come in here and tell us the truth. And you coming here with this story is not gonna cut it. Nothing you have said matches up to what anybody else says so that makes you out a liar.

{¶ 15} "A: I'm not trying to lie to you officer.

{¶ 16} "Eggers: What I'm telling you is you need to set the record straight with these guys and show some remorse for what happened to this little boy.

{¶ 17} "A: Officer, I do, believe me I do feel remorse for this guy, this little boy. *Page 5

{¶ 18} "Eggers: I believe you, I believe you, but I also believe that you are the one responsible for that fire. Like I said all the evidence shows that you are that person. Everybody on the street knows it's you. Everybody.

{¶ 19} "A: And they saying that I did it-

{¶ 20} "Eggers: That's because it's true, and you know it's true. And you sitting here with this story that I didn't do it, I didn't do it, is gonna get you aggravated murder. We've been doing this for a long time. We did our homework.

{¶ 21} "A: May I find representation?

{¶ 22} "Eggers: Do what?

{¶ 23} "A: If I need representation, I'll find that?

{¶ 24} "Eggers: What do you mean?

{¶ 25} "A: By a counselor or something.

{¶ 26} "Eggers: Is that what you are saying that you need an attorney?

{¶ 27} "A: I don't know.

{¶ 28} "Eggers: Well only you can say. What I'm telling you is the evidence clearly shows you are the person responsible for this and when I heard you wanted to come in here, I thought you were coming here to set the record straight. I thought that was what it was about. Because like I said, nobody in here believes that you meant for anybody to die.

{¶ 29} "Estep: This is the only chance you're gonna get to tell us what happened out there. This is the only chance you're gonna get. And like he said, this is the time to tell the truth. This is the time to tell us what happened so we know in our minds what went on out there, instead of what a lot of other people are telling us. And *Page 6

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Jarvis
2024 Ohio 534 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2024)
State v. Fowler
2024 Ohio 361 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2024)
State v. Pulley
2023 Ohio 3277 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2023)
State v. Hudson
2022 Ohio 3253 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2022)
State v. Ford (Slip Opinion)
2019 Ohio 4539 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2019)
State v. Harris
2019 Ohio 2939 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Hammett-Marette
2019 Ohio 394 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Brown
2018 Ohio 4448 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2018)
State v. Nevarez-Reyes
2017 Ohio 2610 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2017)
State v. Gurley
2015 Ohio 5361 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2015)
In re R.L.
2014 Ohio 5065 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
State v. Williamson
2011 Ohio 4095 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
State v. Smith
2011 Ohio 3288 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
State v. Gaddis
2011 Ohio 2822 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
State v. Raber
938 N.E.2d 1060 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2008 Ohio 4926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-knight-04-ca-35-9-26-2008-ohioctapp-2008.