State v. King

347 S.W.3d 174, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1138, 2011 WL 3807571
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 30, 2011·No. ED 95306·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kelly L. King (Defendant) appeals the judgment of conviction entered after a jury found him guilty of felony resisting arrest. Defendant contends the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal because there was insufficient evidence from which a juror could find beyond a reasonable doubt that the trooper was arresting Defendant for committing the felony of second degree domestic assault in that the trooper had no reasonable basis for believing that Defendant had committed that offense.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. King, 347 S.W.3d 174, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1138, 2011 WL 3807571 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

347 S.W.3d 174 (State v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lopez v. State
347 S.W.3d 174 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)