State v. King

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. King

440 S.W.3d 517, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 619, 2014 WL 2520100

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 3, 2014·No. No. ED 99590·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John King (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, convicting Appellant of one count of deviate sexual assault, in violation of Section 566.070. Appellant was found to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John King (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment, convicting Appellant of one count of deviate sexual assault, in violation of Section 566.070. Appellant was found to be a prior and persistent offender and sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. King, 440 S.W.3d 517, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 619, 2014 WL 2520100 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

440 S.W.3d 517 (State v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related