Lopez v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lopez v. State

347 S.W.3d 174, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1136, 2011 WL 3807553

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 30, 2011

DocketED 95287

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 347 S.W.3d 174 (Lopez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lopez v. State, 347 S.W.3d 174, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1136, 2011 WL 3807553 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, German Lopez, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, German Lopez, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

347 S.W.3d 174, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1136, 2011 WL 3807553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lopez-v-state-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack