Lopez v. State
347 S.W.3d 174, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1136, 2011 WL 3807553
Opinion
ORDER
The movant, German Lopez, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lopez v. State, 347 S.W.3d 174, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1136, 2011 WL 3807553 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
347 S.W.3d 174 (Lopez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. King
347 S.W.3d 174 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)