State v. Judd

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Judd

494 S.E.2d 605, 128 N.C. App. 328, 1998 N.C. App. LEXIS 9

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedJanuary 6, 1998

DocketCOA97-213

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 494 S.E.2d 605 (State v. Judd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Judd, 494 S.E.2d 605, 128 N.C. App. 328, 1998 N.C. App. LEXIS 9 (N.C. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

GREENE, Judge.

The State appeals from the trial court’s order allowing Stacy Andrew Judd’s (defendant) motion to suppress evidence of fifty-two grams of crack cocaine seized from him.

On 14 October 1996, the defendant was indicted for conspiracy to traffic in cocaine by possession and transportation and for trafficking cocaine by possession and transportation. The defendant made a motion to suppress the evidence seized, fifty-two grams of crack cocaine, and contended it was obtained in violation of his rights under the United States Constitution and the North Carolina Constitution. The trial court granted the motion to suppress and the State appealed.

The dispositive issue is whether this Court has jurisdiction over the State’s appeal.

“The State may appeal an order by the superior court granting a motion to suppress as provided in G.S. 15A-979.” N.C.G.S. § 15A-1445(b) (Supp. 1996). Subsection (c) of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-979 provides that a superior court order that grants a motion to suppress is appealable “prior to trial upon certificate by the prosecutor to the judge who granted the motion that the appeal is not taken for the purpose of delay and that the evidence is essential to the case.” N.C.G.S. § 15A-979(c) (1988). The burden is on the State to show that it has the right to appeal and has appealed in accordance with the requirements of the statute. State v. Dobson, 51 N.C. App. 445, 447, 276 S.E.2d 480, 482 (1981).

In this case, there is no indication in the record that the prosecutor certified to the trial court, which granted the motion to suppress, that the appeal was not taken to cause delay and that the suppressed evidence was essential to the State’s case. Because the State did not follow the mandate of section 15A-979(c), this Court is without jurisdiction over the appeal. State v. McDonald, 55 N.C. App. 393, 394, 285 S.E.2d 282, 283 (1982).

*330 Dismissed.

Chief Judge ARNOLD and Judge McGEE concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GREENE, Judge.

The State appeals from the trial court’s order allowing Stacy Andrew Judd’s (defendant) motion to suppress evidence of fifty-two grams of crack cocaine seized from him.

On 14 October 1996, the defendant was indicted for conspiracy to traffic in cocaine by possession and transportation and for trafficking cocaine by possession and transportation. The defendant made a motion to suppress the evidence seized, fifty-two grams of crack cocaine, and contended it was obtained in violation of his rights under the United States Constitution and the North Carolina Constitution. The trial court granted the motion to suppress and the State appealed.

The dispositive issue is whether this Court has jurisdiction over the State’s appeal.

“The State may appeal an order by the superior court granting a motion to suppress as provided in G.S. 15A-979.” N.C.G.S. § 15A-1445(b) (Supp. 1996). Subsection (c) of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-979 provides that a superior court order that grants a motion to suppress is appealable “prior to trial upon certificate by the prosecutor to the judge who granted the motion that the appeal is not taken for the purpose of delay and that the evidence is essential to the case.” N.C.G.S. § 15A-979(c) (1988). The burden is on the State to show that it has the right to appeal and has appealed in accordance with the requirements of the statute. State v. Dobson, 51 N.C. App. 445, 447, 276 S.E.2d 480, 482 (1981).

In this case, there is no indication in the record that the prosecutor certified to the trial court, which granted the motion to suppress, that the appeal was not taken to cause delay and that the suppressed evidence was essential to the State’s case. Because the State did not follow the mandate of section 15A-979(c), this Court is without jurisdiction over the appeal. State v. McDonald, 55 N.C. App. 393, 394, 285 S.E.2d 282, 283 (1982).

*330 Dismissed.

Chief Judge ARNOLD and Judge McGEE concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

494 S.E.2d 605, 128 N.C. App. 328, 1998 N.C. App. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-judd-ncctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack