State v. Jones

165 S.W.3d 195, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 917, 2005 WL 1431909
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 546
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 21, 2005·No. No. ED 84693·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alphonso Jones (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury convicted him of possession of marijuana under thirty-five grams, a misdemeanor. The trial court sentenced Defendant as a prior offender to one year’s imprisonment. Defendant contends that the trial court plainly erred by permitting the State of Missouri (“State”) “to extensively question” the venire panel regarding the type or amount of evidence that they would require to convict Defendant, thereby depriving him of his due process rights in that these questions caused a manifest injustice “by misleading potential jurors and calling for a commitment.”

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jones, 165 S.W.3d 195, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 917, 2005 WL 1431909 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

165 S.W.3d 195 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.