State v. Jones

99 S.W.3d 493, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 296, 2003 WL 940815
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 936
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 11, 2003·No. No. ED 81008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Louis Jones (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence imposed after a jury trial finding him guilty of first degree burglary in violation of Section 569.160 RSMo 2000.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the [494]*494reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jones, 99 S.W.3d 493, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 296, 2003 WL 940815 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

99 S.W.3d 493 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.