State v. Jones

136 S.W.3d 523, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 594, 2004 WL 898710
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1971
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 27, 2004·No. No. ED 82962·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Jones (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his convictions by a jury of first-degree robbery, Section 569.020, RSMo 2000 armed criminal action, Section 571.015, RSMo 2000 and unlawful use of a weapon, Section 571.030, RSMo 2000. Defendant was sentenced as a prior offender to thirty year’s imprisonment. In his sole point, Defendant argues that the trial court plainly erred in denying his motion to proceed pro se because he gave a valid waiver of his right to counsel. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jones, 136 S.W.3d 523, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 594, 2004 WL 898710 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

136 S.W.3d 523 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.