State v. Jones

165 S.W.3d 195, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 898, 2005 WL 1431897
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 546
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 21, 2005·No. No. ED 84743·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Reginald Jones (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s denial of his Batson1 challenge. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s challenge was not clearly erroneous. State v. Costello, 101 S.W.3d 311, 312 (Mo.App. E.D.2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jones, 165 S.W.3d 195, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 898, 2005 WL 1431897 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

165 S.W.3d 195 (State v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Batson v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 79 (Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. Costello
101 S.W.3d 311 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003)