Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. James

State v. James

101 So. 3d 867, 2012 WL 4800194, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17380
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 10, 2012
DocketNo. 2D11-5871
StatusPublished

This text of 101 So. 3d 867 (State v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. James, 101 So. 3d 867, 2012 WL 4800194, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17380 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals the dismissal of the charge against Donald E. James for possession of a controlled substance in violation of section 893.13(6)(a), Florida Statutes (2011). The circuit court dismissed the charge based on its conclusion that section 893.13 was facially unconstitutional. We reverse based on the supreme court’s recent decision in State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012), which held that section 893.13 is not facially unconstitutional, and we remand for further proceedings.

Reversed.

DAVIS, VILLANTI, and MORRIS, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Adkins
96 So. 3d 412 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 So. 3d 867, 2012 WL 4800194, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 17380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-james-fladistctapp-2012.