State v. Jackson

468 N.W.2d 431, 161 Wis. 2d 527, 1991 Wisc. LEXIS 297
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedMay 1, 1991
Docket90-0117-CR
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 468 N.W.2d 431 (State v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Jackson, 468 N.W.2d 431, 161 Wis. 2d 527, 1991 Wisc. LEXIS 297 (Wis. 1991).

Opinion

STEINMETZ, J.

When the court accepted this petition for review by the state of Wisconsin subsequent to an unpublished court of appeals decision, the court believed two issues existed pursuant to sec. 809.62, Stats., which sets forth the criteria for accepting petitions. On review, it is obvious that the only question presented pertains to the sufficiency of the evidence. We now determine the petition for review was improvidently granted.

In accepting the petition for review, the court believed it would be presented with evidence that the particular field test for cocaine used by the police, a version of the cobalt thiocyanate test, offered improved reliability and accuracy over other field tests such that the positive result from the test might in itself be sufficient to support a conviction for possession of the drug. No such evidence was presented; in fact, the state now concedes that the cobalt thiocyanate test is nonspecific and at most raises a presumption of the presence of cocaine.

In addition, the nonspecific character of cobalt thio-cyanate test results notwithstanding, the court believed it would be presented with circumstantial evidence which, combined with the positive field test result, might *529 have been sufficient to meet the state's burden of proof. See State v. Wind, 60 Wis. 2d 267, 208 N.W.2d 357 (1973). The circumstantial evidence the court received, however, did not in any way support a determination as to the nature of the substance in question.

The evidence presented by the state may have been sufficient for a finding of probable cause. However, it does little to prove beyond a reasonable doubt an element of a crime which would be necessary for a valid conviction, i.e., that the substance recovered was cocaine.

By the Court. — The petition for review is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Santos Santos
185 P.R. 709 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 2012)
Pueblo v. Santos Santos
2012 TSPR 95 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 2012)
State v. Dye
572 N.W.2d 524 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
468 N.W.2d 431, 161 Wis. 2d 527, 1991 Wisc. LEXIS 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-jackson-wis-1991.